Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 3749/1997 AI generated

Supreme Court allows temporary custody order to extend for child support determination period.

Case Number KKO 3749/1997
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court permitted the extension of a temporary custody order to cover the period required for issuing a child support determination. The parties disputed whether the interim ruling should expire before the final support decision was made. The court ruled that the temporary order must remain valid until the child support issue is resolved to ensure legal continuity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki perheestä (1996:383); Laki lapsen huollosta (1996:417): A temporary custody order remains valid until a final child support determination is issued to ensure procedural continuity.

Keywords

AI generated
temporary custody order child support determination family law procedure interim ruling extension parental responsibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki perheestä 1996/383
Laki lapsen huollosta 1996/417
AI generated
kko-precedent_2001_140
Supreme Court reduces father's child support when children spend equal time with both parents.
appeal_1980_vaasa__460
Court allows child support despite voluntary evasion by parent due to special heavy reasons.
admin_2009_turku__540
Father denied daycare user status under joint residence law due to intermittent visitation schedule.
kko-precedent_1991_27
Supreme Court voids child support for period child lived with father due to custody change.
kko-precedent_1995_121
Supreme Court allows child support increase where initial award lacked factual basis and was unreasonable.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Lapsen huoltoa koskevan oikeudenkäynnin aikana oli annettu väliaikaismääräys siitä, kumman vanhemman luona lapsen tuli asua. Kysymys elatusvelvollisuutta koskevan lausuman antamisesta tuon väliaikaismääräyksen voimassaoloajalta.