Supreme Court held that unauthorized copying of software from an email box constitutes a copyright infringement, not a criminal offense.

Supreme Court rejects standard retail prices for damages in copyright infringement involving electronic mailboxes. The court held that special case circumstances must be considered when determining reasonable compensation under copyright law. This decision clarifies that standard market prices are not automatically applicable in such specific scenarios. The court emphasized the need to evaluate unique factors when calculating damages for copyright violations. The ruling ensures fair compensation based on the specific details of the infringement case. This case establishes important principles for future copyright damage assessments in Finland.

Sexual intercourse without explicit consent constitutes rape; prior sexual history does not imply implied consent.

Supreme Court dismisses industrial property crime charge for EU trademark infringement due to legal certainty violation.

Supreme Court holds employer jointly liable for employee's copyright infringement damages under Finnish Copyright Act.

Supreme Court allows conviction of sole shareholder for accounting offense despite lack of formal board position.