KKO 143/1997
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditions for seizure of security deposit under compulsory measures act.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal concerning the procedural requirements for seizing a security deposit. The appellant argued that specific conditions under the Compulsory Measures Act were not met to justify the seizure of the security deposit. The court ruled that the lower court correctly applied the statutory provisions regarding the prerequisites for such measures.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedPakkokeinoL 3 luku 1 §; The court held that the seizure of a security deposit requires strict adherence to the statutory conditions outlined in the Compulsory Measures Act, and any deviation renders the measure unlawful.
Keywords
AI generated
compulsory measures act
security deposit seizure
procedural requirements
supreme court appeal
financial security
Cited Legislation
AI generatedPakkokeinoL 3 luku 1 §
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_2000_2107
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding oral hearing requirement in debtor insolvency proceedings.
kko-other_1997_4493
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditions for compulsory measures under the Compulsory Measures Act.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:46
Supreme Court upholds conviction for misappropriation where funds were used for other debts risking payment obligations.
kko-other_1998_1795
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages against guarantor for security granted without cause.
kko-other_2010_2386
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding failure to submit criminal case for insolvency proceedings due to procedural error.
Full text
Kysymys hukkaamiskiellon ja vakuutustakavarikon edellytyksistä.
PakkokeinoL 3 luku 1 §