Creditor in debt arrangement case must reimburse state for lawyer fees paid to debtor's counsel upon appeal rejection.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that a creditor in a debt arrangement proceeding must reimburse the state for legal fees paid to the debtor's counsel when the appeal is rejected. The creditor argued that the state's payment to the lawyer was a necessary procedural step, while the state contended that the creditor bears the ultimate cost of the debtor's legal representation. The court held that since the appeal failed, the state's expenditure was unjustified and must be recovered from the creditor who initiated the arrangement.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedMOL 21 § 1 mom; VJL 62 § 1 mom (57/93): When a creditor initiates a debt arrangement and the debtor's appeal is rejected, the creditor is liable to reimburse the state for legal fees advanced to the debtor's counsel by the lower court.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys siitä, oliko velkajärjestelyasiassa muutoksenhaun hävinnyt velkoja velvollinen korvaamaan valtiolle muutoksenhakemukseen vastanneen velallisen oikeudenkäyntiavustajalle hovioikeudessa maksetun palkkion.
MOL 21 § 1 mom
VJL 62 § 1 mom (57/93)