Supreme Court rules partial guarantee expiration does not automatically make remaining liability scattered under guarantee regulations.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court held that a guarantee partially expired under the Guarantee Regulations did not render the remaining liability scattered. The applicant argued the remaining obligation should be treated as scattered, while the opposing party contended the partial expiration left the core liability intact. The court decided that the specific conditions for scattering liability were not met by the partial expiration alone.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAct on the Detailed Determination of the Guarantor's Liability; Act on the Guarantee Regulations: A guarantee partially expired does not automatically render the remaining liability scattered under the guarantee regulations.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kolmen takaajan osalta takaus oli osittain vanhentunut takausmiehen edesvastausvelvollisuuden tarkemmasta määräämisestä annetun asetuksen 4 §:n nojalla. Kysymys siitä, oliko takausvastuu tältä osin saman asetuksen 2 §:n 1 momentin nojalla hajaantunut pääluvun mukaiseksi.