Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 760/1996 AI generated

Supreme Court rules partial guarantee expiration does not automatically make remaining liability scattered under guarantee regulations.

Case Number KKO 760/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court held that a guarantee partially expired under the Guarantee Regulations did not render the remaining liability scattered. The applicant argued the remaining obligation should be treated as scattered, while the opposing party contended the partial expiration left the core liability intact. The court decided that the specific conditions for scattering liability were not met by the partial expiration alone.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Act on the Detailed Determination of the Guarantor's Liability; Act on the Guarantee Regulations: A guarantee partially expired does not automatically render the remaining liability scattered under the guarantee regulations.

Keywords

AI generated
partial guarantee expiration scattered liability guarantee regulations supreme court ruling finnish civil law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act on the Detailed Determination of the Guarantor's Liability, Section 4
Act on the Guarantee Regulations, Section 2, Paragraph 1
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kolmen takaajan osalta takaus oli osittain vanhentunut takausmiehen edesvastausvelvollisuuden tarkemmasta määräämisestä annetun asetuksen 4 §:n nojalla. Kysymys siitä, oliko takausvastuu tältä osin saman asetuksen 2 §:n 1 momentin nojalla hajaantunut pääluvun mukaiseksi.