KKO 4974/1996
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for being filed late to the survey office regarding border control procedures.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal because it was not filed within the statutory time limit to the survey office. The appellant challenged a decision concerning border control procedures, arguing the filing deadline was unclear or inapplicable. The court ruled that strict adherence to the procedural timeline for submitting appeals to the survey office was mandatory for validity.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedValituslain 100 luku; Valituslain 101 luku: An appeal regarding border control procedures is inadmissible if not submitted to the survey office within the prescribed time limit.
Keywords
AI generated
border control procedures
statutory time limit
survey office jurisdiction
procedural admissibility
appeal dismissal
filing deadline
administrative review
Cited Legislation
AI generatedValituslaki 100 luku
Valituslaki 101 luku
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_2001_90
Supreme Court dismissed appeal where insurance company stamp delayed filing but actual submission was timely.
insurance_2009_5239-2008
Insurance court dismissed late appeal due to lack of hearing on delay reasons, remanding for new review.
admin_2014_vaasa__141
Administrative court dismissed appeal due to late filing after office hours despite email notification.
kho-precedent_2010_67
Supreme Administrative Court allows late tender submission where postal box address misled sender regarding delivery location.
admin_2023_northern-finland__139
Administrative court dismissed late appeal; Supreme Court quashed due to procedural delay avoidance.
Full text
Kysymys siitä, oliko rajankäyntitoimitusta koskenut valitus jätetty määräajassa maanmittaustoimistoon.