Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 4775/1996 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses damages claim based on crime when prosecution is dismissed due to statute of limitations. Claimant cannot recover for past crime if state prosecution time-barred. Statute of limitations bars both criminal and civil liability for past offenses.

Case Number KKO 4775/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages arising from a crime after the prosecution was rejected by the Court of First Instance as time-barred. The plaintiff argued that the state's failure to prosecute should not preclude civil compensation for the alleged harm caused by the defendant's actions. The court held that the statute of limitations applicable to criminal proceedings also bars the civil claim, as the underlying criminal liability has expired.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 10 of the Act on the Limitation of Actions; s. 10 of the Act on the Limitation of Actions: The expiration of the limitation period for criminal prosecution precludes the filing of a civil damages claim based on the same criminal act.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations criminal prosecution civil damages claim time bar limitation period

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 10 of the Act on the Limitation of Actions
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys rikokseen perustuvan vahingonkorvausvaatimuksen tutkimisesta, kun syyte hovioikeudessa hylättiin vanhentuneena.