Supreme Court allows damages award against company director for dishonesty despite prior acquittal on criminal charge.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court allowed the claim for damages against the company director, reversing the lower court's dismissal. Although the director was acquitted of criminal charges for dishonesty by the Court of Appeal, the court found that the civil standard of proof was met based on the same factual circumstances. The decision establishes that a criminal acquittal does not preclude a civil finding of liability for damages resulting from dishonest conduct.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKorkein oikeus 1996/423: 10. luku 10.1.1. lakiesitys; 10. luku 10.1.2. lakiesitys: A criminal acquittal does not bar a civil court from finding liability for damages where the civil standard of proof is satisfied by the same facts.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Yhtiön toimitusjohtaja oli käräjäoikeudessa tuomittu rangaistukseen velallisen epärehellisyydestä ja velvoitettu rikoksen johdosta suorittamaan yhtiön velkojille vahingonkorvausta. Hovioikeus oli hylännyt syytteen. Kysymys vahingonkorvauksen tuomitsemisesta.