Supreme Court dismisses prosecution for fraud as the charge was filed after the statute of limitations expired.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution against the defendant for serious fraud, ruling that the charge filed in 1993 was time-barred. Although the lower court had convicted the defendant for aiding fraud based on a 1987 incident, the prosecution was formally initiated years later. The court held that the delay in filing the charge rendered the criminal proceedings inadmissible due to the expiration of the limitation period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 10 of the Act on the Limitation of Criminal Proceedings; the prosecution is inadmissible if the limitation period for criminal proceedings has expired.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Virallinen syyttäjä oli syyttänyt A:ta 23.7.1987 tapahtuneesta törkeästä petoksesta. Hovioikeus oli, hyläten syytteen enemmälti, tuominnut A:n avunannosta petokseen. Syyttäjän valituksesta syyte, joka oli tullut vireille 14.5.1993, hylättiin vanhentuneena.