KKO 3723/1996
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses claim for rent increases as they violate the Indexation Act and are void.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that rent increases deemed contrary to the Indexation Act were void and not subject to restitution. The plaintiff argued for the return of overpaid amounts, but the court found the increases legally invalid from the outset. Consequently, the court dismissed the claim because no legal obligation existed to repay money derived from an illegal adjustment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedIndexation Act; Rent Increase Act: Rent increases determined to be contrary to the Indexation Act are void and do not give rise to an obligation for restitution.
Keywords
AI generated
Indexation Act violation
void rent increases
restitution of illegal payments
Supreme Court review
civil restitution claim
Cited Legislation
AI generatedIndexation Act
Rent Increase Act
Related Decisions
AI generatedadmin_1993_kuopio-county__448
Court allows full interest refund on reduced tax installment due to retroactive tax adjustment.
kko-precedent_1987_50
Supreme Court allows interest claim under Interest Act for delayed restitution under Collection Act.
kko-precedent_2000_110
Supreme Court allows recovery claim against guarantor after debtor's repayment to bankruptcy estate via recovery action.
kko-precedent_1993_124
Voluntary payment reversed by appeal requires only bank base rate interest until statutory delay interest arises.
admin_1997_uusimaa-county__791
Accrued accident pension interest taxed as income rather than capital gains due to lack of investment basis.
Full text
Vuokrankorotukset oli indeksiehdon käytön rajoittamisesta annetun lain vastaisina todettu mitättömiksi. Kysymys siitä, oliko maksetut vuokrankorotukset palautettava.