Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 3702/1996 AI generated

Supreme Court held lower court must request explanation from third party when adding new claimant to labor dispute.

Case Number KKO 3702/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal was required to request an explanation from the opposing party regarding a newly added claimant in a labor dispute. The lower court partially relied on this new claimant without first obtaining necessary clarifications from the defendant. Consequently, the Court of Appeal's decision was remanded to address the procedural defect of failing to seek the required explanation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Korkein oikeus 10.10.1996 3702/1996: Korkeimmassa oikeudessa on velvollisuutta pyytää selitystä lisävastineen antajan vastapuolelta, jos ratkaisu perustuu osittain lisävastineeseen.

Keywords

AI generated
labor dispute procedure third party explanation new claimant addition court of appeal duty procedural defect review
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Hovioikeus oli työsopimuksen laitonta päättämistä koskevassa asiassa pyytänyt asianosaiselta lisävastineen ja osaksi perustanut ratkaisunsa siinä esitettyyn. Kysymys siitä, olisiko hovioikeuden tullut pyytää selitys lisävastineen antajan vastapuolelta.