KKO 346/1996
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding state's liability for litigation costs when opposing party is a public authority.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal concerning the state's obligation to cover litigation costs. The appellant argued that the opposing party, a public authority, should bear the costs under specific statutory provisions. The court ruled that the state is not liable for costs in this context because the opposing party is a public entity exempt from such liability.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 3, Paragraph 1, Chapter 21 of the Act on Court Costs; The state is not liable for litigation costs when the opposing party is a public authority.
Keywords
AI generated
litigation costs
state liability
public authority
court costs
supreme court
legal expenses
cost allocation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedSection 3, Paragraph 1, Chapter 21 of the Act on Court Costs
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_2020_1662
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against lower courts' rulings on asylum rejection and revocation of residence permit.
kko-other_2007_1683
Supreme Court allows litigation costs claim when first-instance court judgment is final and binding.
kko-precedent_2001_114
Supreme Court allows creditor to recover court costs when debtor did not influence enforcement outcome.
kko-precedent_1997_64
Supreme Court held child custody cases do not allow cost shifting unless specific reasons exist, unlike alimony disputes.
kko-precedent_1998_117
Supreme Court remands case to lower court for fact-finding on creditor's liability claim against heir.
Full text
Kysymys oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvausvelvollisuudesta.
OK 21 luku 3 § 1 mom (29.7.1948/572)