Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 2373/1996 AI generated

Workplace injury claim dismissed because surgical implant failure was deemed a manufacturing defect, not an accident.

Case Number KKO 2373/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the employee's claim for work-related injury compensation regarding a torn surgical implant. The employee argued the implant failure constituted a workplace accident, while the employer contended it was a manufacturing defect. The court ruled that the failure of the implant was a product defect rather than an accidental event during work, thus excluding it from work injury coverage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Työmenetelmäsääntely 1 §; Työtapaturmalaki 1 §: If a surgical implant fails due to a manufacturing defect, the resulting injury is classified as a product defect rather than a workplace accident under the Work Accident Act.

Keywords

AI generated
workplace injury compensation surgical implant failure manufacturing defect work accident definition product liability Supreme Court of Finland work accident act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Work Accident Act 1995, Section 1
Work Accident Act 1995, Section 2
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Työntekijän olkapää oli työssä tapaturmaisesti vääntynyt. Työntekijän leikkaushoitoa vaatinutta kiertäjäkalvosimen repeämää pidettiin tapaturman seurauksena.