Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 1343/1996 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses enforcement request when mediation order's vague terms cannot be clarified during enforcement proceedings.

Case Number KKO 1343/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the enforcement application because the mediation order contained vague and partially ambiguous construction obligations. The applicant claimed the work fulfilled the duty, but the respondent argued the scope was unclear. The court held that since the ambiguity could not be resolved within the enforcement procedure, the request for enforcement was rejected.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Mediation Act s. 10; Enforcement Act s. 10: When a mediation order contains vague or ambiguous obligations that cannot be clarified during enforcement proceedings, the enforcement request must be dismissed.

Keywords

AI generated
mediation order enforcement vague construction obligation ambiguity resolution enforcement procedure limits mediation Act provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Mediation Act s. 10
Enforcement Act s. 10
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Välitystuomiossa oli asetettu A:lle tietty rakentamisvelvollisuus. Vastapuolten hakiessa välitystuomion täytäntöönpanoa A ilmoitti jo täyttäneensä velvollisuutensa. Välitystuomiossa velvoite oli ilmoitettu väljästi ja osittain tulkinnanvaraisesti. Erimielisyyttä siitä, vastasiko työ välitystuomiota, ei voitu ratkaista täytäntöönpanomenettelyssä. Täytäntöönpanohakemus hylättiin.