Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding business suspension order due to lack of sufficient evidence of public interest.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's order suspending the applicant's business activities. The applicant argued that the suspension was disproportionate and lacked sufficient justification, while the opposing party contended that immediate action was necessary to protect public interest. The court ruled that the evidence presented failed to meet the high threshold required to justify such a severe restriction on business operations.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLaki liiketoiminnan kieltoon määräämisestä (1066/1994); 1066/1994, 1 §: Business suspension orders require compelling evidence of public interest and proportionality; mere suspicion is insufficient to warrant immediate cessation of operations.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys liiketoimintakieltoon määräämisen edellytyksistä.