Supreme Court dismissed appeal; debtor paid supplier's claim using proceeds from selling assets to a third party.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the validity of a payment made under the Insolvency Act. The debtor sold all exchange and operating assets to a third party and used the proceeds to pay off an expired claim owed to a supplier. The supplier had simultaneously lent the purchasing company an equivalent sum on the same day. The court ruled that the payment was valid because the debtor had no right to the funds at the time of the debt's expiration, and the subsequent transfer to the supplier did not constitute a valid discharge of the original obligation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedInsolvency Act 46 § d; The court held that a payment made by a debtor to a creditor using proceeds from the sale of assets to a third party is valid if the debtor had no right to those funds at the time the debt expired, thereby preventing the creditor from claiming the debt was extinguished.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Velallinen oli takaisinsaantiaikana myynyt kaiken vaihtoja käyttöomaisuutensa ja maksanut saamallaan kauppahinnalla tavarantoimittajan etuoikeutta vailla olleen erääntyneen saatavan. Tavarantoimittaja oli samana päivänä lainannut vaihto- ja käyttöomaisuuden ostaneelle yritykselle saatavaansa vastaavan rahamäärän. Maksu peräytettiin konkurssisäännön 46 §:n d kohdan nojalla.
KS 46 § d kohta