KKO 570/1995
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses claim that debtor's debt was due to obvious recklessness under VJL 10 § 7.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the claim that the debtor incurred the mortgage debt due to obvious recklessness. The court found no evidence that the debtor acted with the requisite level of carelessness under the relevant statute. Consequently, the legal basis for the claim was not met, leading to the rejection of the request.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedVJL 10 § 7; The court held that a claim based on obvious recklessness requires clear evidence of the debtor's negligent conduct, which was absent in this instance.
Keywords
AI generated
VJL 10 § 7
obvious recklessness
mortgage debt
debtor liability
civil negligence
Supreme Court
financial responsibility
Cited Legislation
AI generatedVJL 10 § 7
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_2015_624
Supreme Court allows debt arrangement despite objections if serious reasons exist under the Debt Arrangement Act.
kko-precedent_1997_100
Supreme Court allows debt restructuring despite past loan misrepresentations due to lack of intentional fraud and sudden income drop.
kko-precedent_2012_42
Supreme Court dismisses debt restructuring due to criminal debt and failure to repay despite income.
kko-other_2011_188
Supreme Court allows debt arrangement despite general prohibition due to weighty reasons found.
kko-other_1996_1219
Supreme Court dismisses debt arrangement application where debtor failed to prove insolvency under VJL 10 § 8.
Full text
Kysymys siitä, oliko velallinen ottanut asuntovelan sellaisissa olosuhteissa, että hänen velkaantumistaan oli pidettävä ilmeisen kevytmielisenä.
Ks. KKO:1995:16
VJL 10 § 7 kohta