Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 5192/1995 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; land material permit application rejected due to lack of new investigation.

Case Number KKO 5192/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal regarding the division of a land material permit's special value. The lower court returned the case to the authorities because a new investigation was required to determine the possibility of obtaining the permit. The court upheld this procedural requirement, ruling that the division could not proceed without the necessary factual clarification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Maa-ainelaki 1995; Maa-ainesluvan erityisarvon tilin halkominen vaatii uuden selvityksen mahdollisuudesta saadaan lupa. Jos mahdollisuudesta ei ole esitetty uutta selvitystä, asia palautetaan toimitusmiehille.

Keywords

AI generated
land material permit special value division new investigation requirement procedural return Supreme Court appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Maa-ainelaki 1995
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:74
KHO:2022:74
kko-precedent_1992_15
Supreme Court dismisses expropriation claim for mineral extraction losses due to lack of required permit.
kko-other_2001_9
Supreme Court allows compensation to landowner when quarrying permit ignores potential damage to land.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:76
Supreme Administrative Court quashes permit for extracting materials from ancient remains due to procedural flaws and unclear cost conditions.
kko-precedent_2017_1
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; general division required over total value division due to lack of agreement.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys maa-ainesta koskevasta erityisarvon tilistä halkomisessa. Asia palautettiin toimitusmiehille, kun maa-ainesluvan saamisen mahdollisuudesta oli esitetty uutta selvitystä.