Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding criminal immunity and the duty to surrender seized vehicle and provide equivalent compensation.

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appellant's appeal concerning the scope of criminal immunity and the obligation to surrender a seized automobile. The appellant argued that immunity exempted them from returning the vehicle or paying compensation, while the prosecution insisted on restitution regardless of the immunity status. The court ruled that criminal immunity does not negate the civil obligation to return seized property or provide equivalent compensation, thereby upholding the lower court's decision.