Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of secret listening evidence in criminal proceedings.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's decision to exclude evidence obtained through secret listening. The appellant argued that the evidence was inadmissible under the Criminal Procedure Code due to violations of privacy rights, while the prosecution contended the surveillance was legally authorized and necessary for the investigation. The court ruled that the lower court erred in applying the exclusionary rule, finding the surveillance measures complied with statutory requirements and did not render the evidence inadmissible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCriminal Procedure Code s. 24; Evidence obtained through secret listening is admissible if the surveillance was conducted in accordance with statutory authorization and procedural safeguards, provided it does not violate the fundamental rights of the suspect in a manner that precludes its use.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys salakuuntelusta. (Asiakirjat salaiset)
RL 24 luku 3 b § 1 mom