Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 2310/1995 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses fraud claim where share transfer documents show buyer received shares and assets at signing.

Case Number KKO 2310/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim alleging fraud in a share sale transaction. The defendant argued that the buyer received shares and company assets at the time of signing, while the plaintiff contended the transfer was fraudulent. The court ruled that the documentary evidence of the transfer at signing negated the allegation of fraud.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kauppakirjan 1 luku 100 luku 100; Fraud claims are dismissed where documentary evidence confirms the transfer of shares and assets occurred at the time of signing.

Keywords

AI generated
fraud claim dismissal share transfer fraud company assets transfer signing evidence fraud supreme court ruling
AI generated
kko-precedent_2012_44
Supreme Court allows retrial on price reduction claim due to unclear lower court assessment of buyer's right based on economic error.
kko-other_2001_1654
Supreme Court allows conviction of sole shareholder for accounting offense despite lack of formal board position.
admin_1999_uusimaa-county__598
Administrative court dismissed tax refund claim where dividend distribution was deemed concealed rather than real.
admin_1995_vaasa-county__443
Court dismissed tax evasion claim where company funds paid personal debts were deemed hidden dividends.
kko-other_1996_3125
Supreme Court dismisses fraud charge for selling apartment share to cohabitants without disclosure of prior debt.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli myynyt osakeyhtiön koko osakekannan B:lle. Kauppakirjan mukaan B oli ottanut vastaan yhtiön osakkeet ja varat allekirjoittamishetkellä. Kysymys siitä, mitä yhtiön varoihin oli kuulunut ja oliko A syyllistynyt petokseen kaupan yhteydessä.