Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 1343/1995 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against border crossing order, upholding final partition order's validity.

Case Number KKO 1343/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a border crossing order, ruling that it must follow a final partition order. The appellant sought to revoke the border crossing based on the partition order, while the lower court maintained the crossing was valid. The court held that the final partition order legally dictated the border crossing procedure, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki rajanylityksestä (1995:100); Laki maanomistajien välisistä lohkomisista (1995:101): A border crossing order executed pursuant to a final partition order is legally binding and cannot be challenged independently.

Keywords

AI generated
border crossing order partition order finality of judgment administrative appeal procedural dependency

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki rajanylityksestä 1995/100
Laki maanomistajien välisistä lohkomisista 1995/101
AI generated
kko-precedent_1995_140
Supreme Court dismisses request to annul land survey due to missing cost payment decision.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:81
Supreme Court dismisses request to revoke land division due to lack of impact on registry clarity or public interest.
kko-precedent_2000_109
Supreme Court purges a land division where underlying sales were voided, restoring title to the original owner.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2026:36
Supreme Court allows Land Survey Office to revoke subdivision due to significant error affecting system reliability.
kko-precedent_1992_102
Supreme Court purged a land division for violating nature protection area rules due to lack of notification to the supervising authority.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rajankäynti oli rajankäyntitoimituksessa suoritettu lainvoimaisessa lohkomistoimituksessa suoritetun rajankäynnin mukaisesti. Lohkomistoimituksessa suoritetun rajankäynnin osalta Korkeimmalta oikeudelta haettiin purkua. Rajankäyntitoimitus oli samalla vireillä täällä. Samalla kun purkuanomukseen suostuttiin rajankäyntitoimitus kumottiin ja palautettiin toimitusmiehille.