Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 1161/1995 AI generated

City liable to pay private company for elderly care services after contract termination due to refusal to relocate.

Case Number KKO 1161/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland ruled that the municipality must continue paying the private company for elderly care services after the contract ended. The city decided to stop purchasing these services and relocate the elderly residents, but the residents refused to leave the facility. The court determined that the municipality remained liable for the costs incurred during the transition period following the termination of the service agreement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

City Act 340/1988; Social Services Act 523/1994: The municipality remains liable for costs incurred by a private service provider during the period following the termination of a service agreement if the residents refuse to relocate.

Keywords

AI generated
municipal liability service contract termination elderly care services private provider relocation refusal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
City Act 340/1988
Social Services Act 523/1994
AI generated
kko-other_2016_2354
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiry.
kko-precedent_2001_75
Supreme Court allows claim for parking lot compensation under free purchase agreement, rejecting statute of limitations defense.
admin_2015_turku__23
Administrative court allows partial compensation for repeated fixed-term employment without legal grounds, reducing amount due to early retirement.
kko-precedent_1998_7
Supreme Court allows partial claim for unjust enrichment regarding land improvements made over a decade before partition.
admin_2002_kuopio__683
Administrative court dismissed public law contract claim regarding family caregiver compensation and holiday pay.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kaupunki oli sijoittanut vanhuksia yksityisen yhtiön ylläpitämään asuntolaan toistaiseksi. Kaupungin päätettyä lopettaa näiden palvelujen ostamisen yhtiöltä ja sijoittaa vanhukset muualle he eivät suostuneet muuttamaan pois asuntolasta. Kysymys siitä, oliko kaupunki velvollinen maksamaan yhtiölle vanhusten hoidosta sopimussuhteen päättymisen jälkeiseltä ajalta.