Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO VL:2026-223 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding sentencing for joint robbery by minors involving unknown victims.

Case Number KKO VL:2026-223
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal a case concerning the sentencing of a minor convicted of joint robbery. The defendant, who committed the crimes at age 15, acted in collusion with other minors against strangers in public spaces. The court permitted the appeal to review the appropriateness of the imposed sentence given the specific circumstances of the joint offense.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 29 of the Juvenile Justice Act; Section 26 of the Penal Code: The Supreme Court allows an appeal when the sentencing of a minor for joint criminal acts requires review of the proportionality and specific mitigating factors involved in the collaboration with other juveniles.

Keywords

AI generated
minor criminal liability joint robbery sentencing juvenile justice act collaborative offense supreme court appeal proportionality principle public place crime

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 29 of the Juvenile Justice Act
Section 26 of the Penal Code
AI generated
kko-other_1996_2953
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding sentence and probation for a minor charged with serious robbery.
kko-precedent_1994_22
Supreme Court allows probation for 2-year sentence for 16-year-old robber despite severity due to lack of strong reasons.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:30
Supreme Court reduces sentence for juvenile sexual abuse but upholds mandatory life imprisonment due to severity.
kko-other_2013_1451
Supreme Court allows conditional sentence for first-time offender despite serious charges of aggravated assault and coercion.
kko-precedent_2017_69
Supreme Court reduced rape charge to basic rape and increased sentence for 18-year-old defendant while keeping minors' conditional sentences.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli syyllistynyt 15-vuotiaana törkeään ryöstöön ja neljään ryöstöön. Teot oli tehty

yhdessä alle 15-vuotiaiden henkilöiden kanssa. Ne olivat tapahtuneet julkisilla

paikoilla ja kohdistuneet A:lle entuudestaan tuntemattomiin 12–15-vuotiaisiin

asianomistajiin, joilta oli anastettu muun muassa asusteita ja elektroniikkaa.

Kysymys rangaistuksen määräämisestä.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.