Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO VL:2026-218 AI generated

Supreme Court allows consumer loan claim for 49% penalty interest when standard terms are deemed unreasonable and non-binding.

Case Number KKO VL:2026-218
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the consumer's appeal regarding a 49% penalty interest rate on a loan principal. The lower courts had found the standard terms regarding loan costs to be unreasonable and non-binding for the consumer. The court ruled that the specific agreement for 49% penalty interest remained valid despite the invalidity of the general cost terms, establishing that the penalty clause was not automatically voided by the unreasonableness of the broader loan conditions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Consumer Credit Act 1998; Consumer Credit Act 1998: When standard terms are declared unreasonable and non-binding, specific contractual clauses like penalty interest rates may remain enforceable if they were separately agreed upon and not themselves unreasonable.

Keywords

AI generated
consumer credit law unreasonable terms penalty interest rate non-binding clauses contractual validity Supreme Court appeal loan costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Consumer Credit Act 1998
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys siitä, oliko kuluttajaluoton pääomalle maksettava erikseen sovittua 49

prosentin suuruista viivästyskorkoa tilanteessa, jossa luoton luottokustannuksia

koskevat vakioehdot oli katsottu kohtuuttomiksi ja kuluttajaa sitomattomiksi.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.