Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO VL:2026-15 AI generated

Supreme Court rules debt restructuring payment plan termination request was timely filed without unjustified delay.

Case Number KKO VL:2026-15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal regarding whether a request to terminate a debt restructuring payment plan was filed without unjustified delay after the creditor learned the grounds. The applicant argued the request was timely, while the opposing party contended there was a delay. The court decided the request complied with the statutory requirements for filing without unjustified delay.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 61(1) of the Act on Individual Debt Restructuring; a request to terminate a payment plan must be filed without unjustified delay after the creditor learns the grounds, and minor delays do not constitute unjustified delay.

Keywords

AI generated
debt restructuring payment plan termination unjustified delay creditor notice statutory filing deadline leave to appeal timely request

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 61(1) of the Act on Individual Debt Restructuring
AI generated
kko-other_2002_1566
Supreme Court dismissed creditor's claim for payment order cessation as it lacked unreasonably delayed grounds.
kko-other_2002_2080
Supreme Court allows new debt arrangement for previous debtors whose payment plans were ordered to cease.
kko-other_2007_97
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding debt restructuring payment scheme changes without unjustified delay after notice.
kko-other_1996_1219
Supreme Court dismisses debt arrangement application where debtor failed to prove insolvency under VJL 10 § 8.
kko-other_1999_3592
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding debt restructuring eligibility under Finnish personal debt restructuring law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys siitä, oliko velkajärjestelyn maksuohjelman raukeamista koskeva hakemus tehty

yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä annetun lain 61 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitetulla

tavalla ilman aiheetonta viivytystä sen jälkeen, kun peruste siihen oli tullut

velkojan tietoon.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.