Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO VL:2025-210 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses late inheritance division claim as procedurally inadmissible due to missed filing deadline.

Case Number KKO VL:2025-210
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding a late-filed inheritance division claim lodged by co-owner A. The procedural issue centered on whether the claim, submitted after the statutory deadline, should be rejected as inadmissible. The court ruled that the claim was untimely and thus procedurally barred, rejecting the appellant's arguments for an extension.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Inheritance Act; Succession Act: A claim for division of an inheritance is inadmissible if filed after the statutory limitation period has expired without valid grounds for extension.

Keywords

AI generated
inheritance division statutory limitation period procedural inadmissibility co-owner claim Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Inheritance Act
Succession Act
AI generated
kko-precedent_1988_112
Supreme Court dismisses inheritance claim because statutory limitation period for supplementary action did not apply. The court held that the claim was not a supplementary action under the Inheritance Act. The court ruled that the claim was not a supplementary action under the Inheritance Act. The court ruled that the claim was not a supplementary action under the Inheritance Act.
kko-precedent_2013_102
Supreme Court allows partial inheritance division claim against one co-owner based on their admission only.
kko-precedent_1997_203
Supreme Court allows late divorce property separation claim by applying procedural time limit rules to filing date instead of service date.
kko-precedent_1991_101
Supreme Court allows transfer of divorce property division case to competent court after statute of limitations expired.
kko-precedent_1993_105
Supreme Court allows new claim for reduced share after inheritance division deadline due to same underlying ground.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pesänjakaja oli toimittanut osituksen ja perinnönjaon, josta hän oli laatinut

4.4.2023 päivätyn jakopäätöksen. Kuolinpesän osakkeiden pyynnöstä pesänjakaja oli

oikaisut jakopäätöstä 24.5.2023 päivätyllä jakopäätöksellä. Kuolinpesän osakas A oli

nostanut asiassa perinnönjaon moitekanteen 20.11.2023. Kysymys siitä, oliko A:n

kanne jätettävä myöhään nostettuna tutkimatta.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.