Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO:2007:15 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding objection to appeal ban and admissibility of decision.

Case Number KHO:2007:15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal concerning the objection to the appeal ban attached to an administrative decision and the decision's admissibility. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the decision in question was not subject to appeal under the relevant administrative and nationality laws. Consequently, the court determined that the procedural objections raised by the appellant failed to meet the statutory requirements for review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Administrative Procedure Act s. 5; Administrative Act s. 8, 22 § 1 and 3, 33; Nationality Act s. 13 § 1 mom. 6, 17, 42, 45, 46: An appeal against a decision containing an appeal ban is inadmissible if the decision itself is not legally appealable under the governing statutes.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal ban decision admissibility nationality law appeal procedural objection dismissal supreme administrative court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Administrative Procedure Act s. 5
Administrative Act s. 8
Administrative Act s. 22 § 1 and 3
Administrative Act s. 33
Nationality Act s. 13 § 1 mom. 6
Nationality Act s. 17
Nationality Act s. 42
Nationality Act s. 45
Nationality Act s. 46

Cited Case Law

AI generated
HFD 22.3.2007 ref 383
AI generated
kho-precedent_2007_85
Supreme Administrative Court allows citizenship claim where government language examiner's statement meets statutory language proficiency requirements.
kho-other_2017_5129
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses citizenship claim and oral hearing request due to lack of compelling grounds for language exception.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2017:200
Supreme Administrative Court allows citizenship claim by illiterate applicant based on teacher's proof of basic language skills.
kho-other_2019_2860
Supreme Administrative Court partially allowed asylum appeal, upholding deportation due to insufficient personal risk evidence.
admin_1995_water-superior__115
Administrative court quashed water authority decision for failing to announce ruling in both Finnish and Swedish languages.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Hallinto-oikeuden päätökseen liitetyn valituskiellon ja sen päätöksen valituskelpoisuuden osalta kuten KHO 22.2.2007 taltionumero 383.

Hallintolainkäyttölain 5 §, hallintolain 8 §, 22 §:n 1 ja 3 momentti sekä 33 §, kansalaisuuslain 13 §:n 1 momentin 6 kohta, 17 §, 42 §, 45 § ja 46 §.

Kort referat på svenska

---

[SV]

I fråga om det besvärsförbud som fogats till förvaltningsdomstolens beslut och beslutets överklagbarhet avgjordes målet på samma sätt som HFD 22.3.2007 liggarnummer 383.

Förvaltningsprocesslagen 5 §, förvaltningslagen 8, 22 § 1 och 3 mom. samt 33 §, medborgarskapslagen 13 § 1 mom. 6 punkten samt 17, 42, 45 och 46 §