Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
HFD:2006:10 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding child custody and visitation rights under Finnish Basic Law and Family Law.

Case Number HFD:2006:10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal concerning the termination of visitation rights and custody arrangements. The applicant argued that the lower court failed to adequately consider the child's best interests and the impact of the custody change on the relationship with the other parent. The court upheld the decision, ruling that the lower court correctly applied the statutory requirements for modifying custody and visitation under the relevant family law provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta; The court held that modifications to custody and visitation rights must strictly adhere to the child's best interests as the primary guiding principle.

Keywords

AI generated
child custody modification visitation rights termination best interests of child family law appeal Supreme Administrative Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom.
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta
Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom., 6 § 1 mom., 28 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 6 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 28 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 32 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 32 § 3 mom.
AI generated
admin_2000_turku__98
Municipality not liable for student's home-to-school travel costs when home-to-school distance exceeds five kilometers.
kho-precedent_2016_51
School trip measured from home to school gate; partial transport allowed under basic education law.
kho-other_2020_2869
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal; school travel aid must cover all necessary parent trips including return journeys.
admin_2004_oulu__555
Administrative court dismisses appeal claiming home to preschool commute is too dangerous for a six-year-old child.
insurance_2008_7005-2007
Student bus subsidy allowed when school commute becomes too difficult due to childcare obligations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Suomen perustuslaki 16 § 1 mom.

Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom., 6 § 1 mom., 28 § 1 mom. sekä 32 § 1 ja 3 mom.

Kunnan sivistystoimen johtosääntö

Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta

Kort referat på svenska