Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO:2004:92 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against building permit decision regarding land use and planning law violations.

Case Number KHO:2004:92
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Regional Administrative Court's confirmation of a building permit. The applicant argued that the permit violated land use and planning laws by failing to consider necessary environmental and traffic impacts. The court held that the lower court correctly applied the relevant statutes and found no legal error in the permit's issuance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 §; 172 §: The Supreme Administrative Court reviews building permit decisions for compliance with land use and planning laws, affirming permits where the lower court properly assessed statutory requirements and rejected appeals lacking legal merit.

Keywords

AI generated
building permit decision land use law planning law violation administrative appeal Supreme Administrative Court environmental impact traffic considerations

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 1 mom.
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 1 mom., 171 § 2 mom.
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 2 mom. 2 kohta
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 3 mom.
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 172 §
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 214 §
AI generated
admin_2016_aland__73
Administrative court dismissed building permit deviation due to non-fulfilled planning area requirements and building code limits.
kho-other_2016_5427
Appeal dismissed; minor residential building on sauna plot deemed not to harm zoning plan implementation.
kho-other_2016_3752
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; planning deviation violates equal treatment and causes harm to plan implementation.
kho-other_2016_416
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against ELY rejection, ruling that a coastal zone plan exists for the sauna building site.
kho-precedent_2005_8
Building permit required for sauna on coast zone without plan; environmental center has jurisdiction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 1 mom., 171 § 2 mom. 2 kohta, 171 § 3 mom., 172 § ja 214 §

Kort referat på svenska