Supreme Administrative Court held that a magistrate's inspection and non-punitive warning under the Guardianship Act did not constitute an appealable administrative decision.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal regarding a magistrate's inspection and accompanying warning under the Guardianship Act. The court found that since the inspection and warning carried no sanctions, they did not meet the criteria for an appealable administrative decision under the Administrative Procedure Act. Consequently, the applicant was denied the right to challenge the measure through the administrative courts.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLaki holhoustoimesta 56 §; Hallintolainkäyttölaki 5 § 1 mom.: An inspection and non-punitive warning by a magistrate under the Guardianship Act does not constitute an appealable administrative decision.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Holhoustoimesta annetun lain 56 §:n mukainen maistraatin tarkastustoimenpide ja siihen liittyvä kehotus, jonka noudattamiseen ei liittynyt tehostetta, ei sisältänyt hallintolainkäyttölain 5 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitettua valituskelpoista päätöstä. Äänestys 4-1.
Laki holhoustoimesta 56 § ja 87 § 1 mom.
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 5 § 1 mom.
Kort referat på svenska
---
[SV]
En granskning som magistraten utför enligt 56 § i lagen om förmyndarverksamhet och en uppmaning i samband med granskningen, vars hörsammande inte var förknippat med sanktioner, innehöll inte ett beslut som kan överklagas enligt 5 § 1 mom. i förvaltningsprocesslagen. Omröstning 4-1.