Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO:2000:76 AI generated

Former bank head's pension tax deduction for loss compensation is denied due to personal gain from loans.

Case Number KHO:2000:76
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the former bank head's claim to deduct pension income from loss compensation payments. The court found that despite the lack of intentional harm, the head and his family received financial benefits from the loans, creating a conflict of interest. Consequently, the court ruled that the head had no right to reduce his pension taxes based on expenses related to earning or retaining that income.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ennakkoperintälaki 1 ja 2 §; Tuloverolaki 29 § 1 mom.: A former bank head cannot deduct pension income from loss compensation if he or his close relatives received financial benefit from the loans causing the loss.

Keywords

AI generated
pension tax deduction loss compensation conflict of interest bank loan abuse income retention expenses

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ennakkoperintälaki 1 ja 2 §
Ennakkoperintälaki 1 ja 2 §
Tuloverolaki 29 § 1 mom.
Tuloverolaki 29 § 1 mom.
AI generated
kko-precedent_2000_58
Supreme Court partially allowed appeal to reduce damages for savings bank manager's breach of duty.
kko-other_2001_2306
Supreme Court dismissed claim against bank executives for loan losses, ruling liability requires direct fault or breach of duty.
kko-precedent_2014_101
Supreme Court allows damages claim against debtor despite prior default judgment due to asset concealment.
kho-precedent_2000_75
Tax court allows deduction of bank director's settlement payment for negligent loan granting as business expense.
kko-other_2005_2476
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages against a debtor based on insolvency and lack of fault.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Entinen pankinjohtaja oli tuomittu suorittamaan vahingonkorvausta, koska hän oli esteellisenä ja pankin ohjeiden ja määräysten vastaisesti johtajan asemaansa hyväksikäyttäen myöntänyt luottoja omiin ja vaimonsa asuntokauppoihin sekä siirtänyt tyttärensä ja vävynsä yhtiön velkoja toiselle yhtiölle, mistä toimenpiteistä aiheutui pankille vahinkoa luottojen jäätyä maksamatta. Vaikka hän ei olisikaan aiheuttanut vahinkoa tahallaan, niin pankinjohtajan ja hänen läheistensä saadessa luotonannoista taloudellista etua eläkkeellä olevalla pankinjohtajalla ei ollut oikeutta vähentää eläketuloistaan vahingonkorvausta tulon hankkimisesta tai säilyttämisestä johtuneena menona. Ennakonkanto vuodelle 1999.

Ennakkoperintälaki 1 ja 2 §

Tuloverolaki 29 § 1 mom.