Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO:1998:82 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against lower court's decision to leave municipal road access claim unexamined.

Case Number KHO:1998:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the District Court's decision to leave the municipal authority's claim for road access unexamined. The applicant challenged the initial decision to ignore the claim, while the lower court later accepted the authority's request for access. The court ruled that the lower court correctly exercised its discretion to defer the examination of the access claim to a subsequent request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kuntalaki 91 §; Rakennuslaki 103 § 3 mom.: The administrative court may decide to leave a claim for road access unexamined if the applicant subsequently submits a separate request for such access, deferring the substantive review to the new application.

Keywords

AI generated
road access claim municipal authority deferred examination administrative discretion subsequent request Kuntalaki 91 Rakennuslaki 103

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kuntalaki 91 §
Rakennuslaki 103 § 3 mom.
Rakennuslaki 103 § 3 mom.
AI generated
admin_2006_turku__22
Administrative court dismissed appeals against zoning plan decisions where property owners were not directly affected.
admin_2017_aland__28
Administrative court dismissed appeal as municipal planning decision was not legally appealable under Åland laws.
kho-precedent_2004_74
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; city's request for expropriation procedure is only preparatory and not appealable.
kho-other_2016_3849
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against wind farm zoning plan approval due to procedural errors and environmental impact concerns.
kho-precedent_2014_77
Appeal dismissed; municipal council's refusal to review land acquisition request is inadmissible under municipal law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kunnanhallitus oli 21.8.1996 päättänyt hakea lääninoikeudelta oikeutta ottaa haltuun tiealue rakennuskaavatien rakentamista varten. A haki kunnanhallituksen päätökseen muutosta lääninoikeudelta, joka päätöksellään 3.10.1996 jätti valituksen vain valmistelupäätöstä koskevana tutkimatta.

Kunnanhallitus oli sittemmin 11.11.1996 lääninoikeuteen saapuneella hakemuksellaan hakenut mainittua oikeutta tiealueen haltuunottoon.

Lääninoikeuden oli tullut valituksenalaisella päätöksellään jättää A:n valitus kunnanhallituksen 21.8.1996 tekemästä päätöksestä tutkimatta.

Kuntalaki 91 §

Rakennuslaki 103 § 3 mom.