Supreme Administrative Court dismissed compensation claim for permanent natural damage based on forestry law provisions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's claim for compensation regarding permanent natural damage caused by forestry operations. The applicant argued that the state failed to adequately compensate for the loss of land value, while the opposing party contended that the statutory framework for such compensation had been fully implemented. The court ruled that the specific legal provisions governing compensation in this context did not support the applicant's requested remedy.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedMaa- ja metsätalouden rakennepoliittisista toimenpiteistä annettu laki (1303/94) 13 §; Valtioneuvoston päätös pysyvän luonnonhaitan korvaamisesta (861/95) 6 §: Compensation for permanent natural damage is strictly regulated by specific statutory provisions, and claims must align precisely with the defined scope and conditions of these laws.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Neuvoston asetus (ETY) N:o 2328/91 17, 18 ja 19 artikla
Neuvoston direktiivi 75/268/ETY 1 artikla
Euroopan neuvoston ihmisoikeussopimuksen 4. pöytäkirjan (18.5.1990) 2 artiklan 1 ja 3 kohta
Suomen hallitusmuoto (94/19) 5 ja 7 § sellaisina, kuin ne ovat muutettuna lailla (969/95)
Maa- ja metsätalouden rakennepoliittisista toimenpiteistä annettu laki (1303/94) 13 §
Valtioneuvoston päätös pysyvän luonnonhaitan korvaamisesta (861/95) 6 §