Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; municipal council decision valid despite procedural defects under Kuntalaki 52 and HML 10-11.

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against a municipal council decision regarding land use. The applicant argued that the council violated procedural requirements under the Municipal Code and the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to properly notify interested parties. The court held that the substantive decision remained valid because the procedural irregularities did not affect the outcome or the rights of the parties involved.