Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO:1998:17 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court quashes lower court decision due to conflicting interpretations of permit requirements.

Case Number KHO:1998:17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court quashed the regional court's decision because it held a different view on the necessity of a waste permit. The lower court failed to address whether permit conditions should be set based on the Council Directive 86/278/EEC and the Finnish Waste Act. Consequently, the case was remitted for reconsideration in light of the correct legal interpretation of waste management regulations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Council Directive 86/278/EEC Article 2(a) and (b); Waste Act Section 42, Section 43(1), Section 1(2) of Section 2: When a lower court decision is based on a different interpretation of the requirement for a waste permit than the Supreme Administrative Court, the lower decision is quashed and the case is remitted for a new decision.

Keywords

AI generated
waste permit requirement Council Directive 86/278 Finnish Waste Act conflicting legal interpretation quashing lower court decision remittal for new decision environmental regulation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Council Directive 86/278/EEC Article 2(a) and (b)
Finnish Waste Act Section 42
Finnish Waste Act Section 43(1)
Finnish Waste Act Section 1(2) of Section 2
AI generated
admin_2019_vaasa__249
Administrative court dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Finland.
admin_2001_hameenlinna__298
Administrative court dismissed immediate appeal request, remanding disability benefit case for re-examination by authority.
market_2024_473
Market Court dismissed appeal against administrative decision regarding illegal residence permit revocation under Finnish Immigration Act.
kko-other_2010_2458
Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal objection, ruling procedural silence does not equate to formal withdrawal.
kho-other_2018_2851
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses environmental permit appeal due to lack of admissibility grounds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Koska lääninoikeudella oli ollut jäteluvan tarpeesta toinen käsitys, lääninoikeuden päätös kumottiin. Korkein hallintooikeus ei ottanut välittömästi ratkaistavakseen kysymystä siitä, oliko tässä tapauksessa edellytyksiä myöntää toimintaa varten jätelupa tai minkälaisia ehtoja tuonlaiselle luvalle olisi asetettava ottaen muun ohella huomioon valtioneuvoston päätöksen 282/1994 asettamat vaatimukset.

Neuvoston direktiivin 86/278/ETY 2 artiklan a- ja b-kohdat JäteL_42_§ JäteL_43_§_1_mom JäteA_1_§_2_mom_2_kohta