Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO:1998:16 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court partially allowed appeal on firearm license revocation, dismissing new license request while reviewing rights to fair trial.

Case Number KHO:1998:16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court partially allowed the appeal, dismissing the request for a new hunting license while reviewing the revocation of existing licenses. The applicant argued that revoking licenses without a new one violated their right to a fair trial under the European Convention on Human Rights. The court held that the revocation decision stood but the procedural defect regarding the new license application required correction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

SopS 18-19/1990 6 artikla 1 kappale; L_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_1_§ (33/1933); A_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_42_§ (34/1933): The court established that while revocation of hunting licenses may be lawful, the procedural requirement to consider a new license application separately ensures compliance with the right to a fair trial.

Keywords

AI generated
firearm license revocation fair trial rights hunting license renewal procedural fairness European Convention rights administrative review license suspension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
SopS 18-19/1990 6 artikla 1 kappale
L_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_1_§ (33/1933)
Ihmisoikeuksien ja perusvapauksien suojaamiseksi tehdyn yleissopimuksen (SopS 18-19/1990) 6 artikla 1 kappale L_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_1_§ (33/1933) A_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_42_§ (34/1933)
A_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_42_§ (34/1933)
Ihmisoikeuksien ja perusvapauksien suojaamiseksi tehdyn yleissopimuksen (SopS 18-19/1990) 6 artikla 1 kappale L_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_1_§ (33/1933) A_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_42_§ (34/1933)
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:10
Supreme Administrative Court ruled that the Migration Agency could not deny a residence permit solely based on Article 33(2) without assessing Article 54(1).
kho-precedent_2015_101
Court dismisses appeal regarding environmental permit condition expiry due to legislative change. The court held that a specific condition for plan submission did not constitute a mandatory review obligation. The court ruled that the condition was not a review obligation subject to legislative change. The court found no grounds to alter the administrative court's decision based on the case facts. The court determined the condition was not a review obligation under the new law. The court concluded the condition was not a review obligation under the new law.
kko-other_2010_2458
Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal objection, ruling procedural silence does not equate to formal withdrawal.
admin_1998_turku-and-pori-county__438
Firearms license revoked for violent crime even if prosecutor dropped charges due to victim's request.
kho-precedent_2013_73
Supreme Administrative Court allowed appeal, ruling authority must assess facility suitability rather than impose arbitrary occupancy limits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Äänestys 5-3

Äänestäneet jäsenet jättivät valituksen tutkimatta uuden haulikon hallussapitoluvan osalta, mutta haulikon ja metsästyskiväärin hallussapitolupien peruuttamista koskevalta osalta poistivat LH:n päätökseen liitetyn valituskiellon ja tutkivat valituksen. Asiassa oli kysymys X:n oikeudesta oikeudenmukaiseen oikeudenkäyntiin. Hallintaluvan peruuttamista koskeva päätös koski luvanhaltijan oikeutta Suomen Hallitusmuodon 16 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitetulla tavalla.

HM 16 § (969/1995)

Ihmisoikeuksien ja perusvapauksien suojaamiseksi tehdyn yleissopimuksen (SopS 18-19/1990) 6 artikla 1 kappale L_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_1_§ (33/1933) A_ampuma-aseista_ja_ampumatarpeista_42_§ (34/1933)