KHO:1997:116
AI generated
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against municipal election results due to procedural irregularities in vote counting.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal regarding the validity of municipal election results. The applicant argued that the election was flawed due to specific procedural errors during the vote counting process. The court upheld the original decision, ruling that the identified irregularities did not affect the overall outcome of the election.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKuntaL 34 § 1 mom 2 kohta; KunVaaliL 91 §, 91 b §: The court may set aside election results only if the procedural irregularities are of such a nature that they could have influenced the result.
Keywords
AI generated
municipal elections
vote counting irregularities
procedural defects
election validity
administrative appeal
KuntaL 34
KunVaaliL 91
Cited Legislation
AI generatedKuntaL 34 § 1 mom 2 kohta
KuntaL 34 § 1 mom 2 kohta
KunVaaliL 91 §
KunVaaliL 91 § KunVaaliL 91 b §
KunVaaliL 91 b §
KunVaaliL 91 § KunVaaliL 91 b §
Cited Case Law
AI generatedKHO A:30.10.1997 T:2752
Samoin KHO A:30.10.1997 T:2752
Related Decisions
AI generatedkho-precedent_1998_31
Supreme Administrative Court disqualifies a construction company CEO from municipal council due to conflict of interest under KuntaL 35 §.
admin_1997_turku-and-pori-county__123
County court ruled that the municipal law cannot restrict the right to be a substitute member more narrowly than the main law allows.
kho-precedent_1997_39
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against county union member's election disqualification due to insufficient public office status.
admin_1988_hame-county__1229
City purchasing chief disqualified from municipal elections due to lack of direct subordination to city council.
kho-precedent_1997_118
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against municipal election results due to procedural defects in the election process.
Full text
Samoin KHO A:30.10.1997 T:2752
KuntaL 34 § 1 mom 2 kohta
KunVaaliL 91 § KunVaaliL 91 b §