Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO:1997:113 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court rejects appeal against hunting permit denial on state land under Hunting Act provisions.

Case Number KHO:1997:113
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Rural Industry Appeal Board against the Forestry Administration's refusal of a hunting permit. The Forestry Administration denied the permit under Section 46 of the Hunting Act, asserting it was a state-owned area where hunting was prohibited. The court upheld the denial, ruling that the administrative body correctly applied the statutory restrictions on hunting on state lands.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Metsästyslain 46 §; Metsästyslain 44 §: The court established that hunting permits are denied on state-owned areas when the Hunting Act explicitly prohibits hunting there, and appeals against such denials must be directed to the Rural Industry Appeal Board.

Keywords

AI generated
hunting permit denial state owned land Hunting Act provisions administrative appeal process forestry administration authority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Metsästyslain 46 §
Metsähallituksen Oulun alueyksikkö oli hylännyt yksityisen henkilön metsästyslain 46 §:ssä tarkoitetun hakemuksen metsästysluvan saamisesta valtion alueelle.
Metsästyslain 44 §
Metsästyslain 6 §
AI generated
kho-other_2016_5438
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal on hunting license due to late cost reimbursement claim and upheld lower court decision.
kho-precedent_1997_10
Company dismissed as non-party in water area permit case lacking legal standing or ownership.
admin_1996_water-superior__83
Company appeal dismissed for lack of water right to object to forestry permit on marine area.
admin_2026_vaasa__133
Administrative court dismissed appeal against water law enforcement order for over 20 hectares of ditching.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:3
Court allows appeal against forestry ban, ruling Natura assessment required due to missing impact data.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Metsähallituksen Oulun alueyksikkö oli hylännyt yksityisen henkilön metsästyslain 46 §:ssä tarkoitetun hakemuksen metsästysluvan saamisesta valtion alueelle. Kysymyksessä oli Metsähallitukselle metsästyslain mukaan kuuluva viranomaistehtävä, jota koskevasta päätöksestä sai Metsähallituksesta annetun lain 4 §:n 2 momentin mukaan valittaa maaseutuelinkeinojen valituslautakunnalle. ()

Äänestys 4-4

L Metsähallituksesta 1 §

L Metsähallituksesta 2 § 3 mom

L Metsähallituksesta 2 § 5 mom

L Metsähallituksesta 4 § 2 mom

A Metsähallituksesta 5 § 2 kohta

MetsästysL 6 §

MetsästysL 44 §

MetsästysL 46 §