Foreigners Act decision reversed due to conflicting internal views requiring remand for fresh consideration.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's request, ruling that the Foreigners Act decision was invalid due to internal inconsistencies. The foreign office held two conflicting views on a material fact affecting the case resolution. Consequently, the court quashed the original decision and remanded the matter to the foreign office for a new, consistent evaluation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUlkomaalaislaki 16 § 5 mom: When an administrative body holds conflicting views on a fact influencing the decision, the decision must be quashed and the case remanded for reconsideration.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Koska ulkomaalaisvirastolla oli ollut mainitusta asian ratkaisuun vaikuttavasta seikasta toinen käsitys, ulkomaalaisviraston päätös kumottiin ja asia palautettiin ulkomaalaisvirastolle uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.
UlkomaalaisL 16 § 5 mom