Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO:1997:1 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court quashed environmental center's decision and sent case back for reconsideration regarding neighbor complaints.

Case Number KHO:1997:1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court quashed the Environmental Centre's decision rejecting neighbor complaints and remitted the matter to the municipal council for re-evaluation. The neighbors argued that the council's permit for building H violated their rights, while the council and Environmental Centre maintained the decision was lawful. The court found errors in the procedural handling of the complaints and ordered a fresh examination by the municipal authority.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

KunL 104 §; RakennusL 124 a § 1 mom; RakennusA 146 d §; HallintomenettelyL 17 § 2 mom: When administrative decisions regarding building permits are challenged by neighbors based on procedural flaws or substantive errors, the court may quash the decision and remand the case for a new examination by the competent authority.

Keywords

AI generated
neighbor complaints building permit municipal council procedural error remittal of case environmental centre administrative review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
KunL 139 § (953/76)
KuntaL 104 §
RakennusL 124 a § 1 mom
RakennusA 146 d §
HallintomenettelyL 17 § 2 mom
HallintomenettelyL 17 § 2 mom

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO D:1866/2/96
Ks. myös KHO D:1866/2/96
AI generated
kko-other_2009_533
Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal objection, ruling withdrawal does not automatically suspend oral hearing proceedings.
kko-other_1998_1727
Supreme Court dismisses appeal as withdrawn; applicant withdrew complaint, halting proceedings.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2023:122
Supreme Administrative Court allows partial amendment of water regulation permit under transitional water law provisions.
admin_2004_vaasa__67
Court ruled that a change in waste treatment plant requirements requires a full new permit, not a temporary one.
kko-other_2010_2458
Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal objection, ruling procedural silence does not equate to formal withdrawal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Näistä syistä korkein hallinto-oikeus naapurien valituksista kumosi ympäristökeskuksen päätöksen, jolla heidän valituksensa H:n kunnanhallituksen lupapäätöksestä oli hylätty, ja kunnanhallituksen päätöksen sekä palautti asian viimeksi mainitulle uudelleen käsiteltäväksi. D:1865/2/96

Ks. myös KHO D:1866/2/96

KunL 139 § (953/76)

KuntaL 104 §

RakennusL 124 a § 1 mom

RakennusA 146 d §

HallintomenettelyL 17 § 2 mom