Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
HFD 26.1.2026/174 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal on planning scheme permit request due to lack of special grounds.

Case Number HFD 26.1.2026/174
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court rejected the appeal filed by a client and six companions regarding a planning scheme permit. The lower court had already resolved the matter, and the appellants failed to demonstrate a special reason for review under the Administrative Court Act. Consequently, the court found no grounds to grant a leave of appeal, resulting in the dismissal of the request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Administrative Court Act 621/1999, s. 111; Leave of appeal is granted only if it is necessary for uniform application of law, due to obvious error, or for other weighty reasons, and was not granted here as no such grounds existed.

Keywords

AI generated
planning scheme permit leave of appeal Administrative Court Act uniform application of law special grounds for review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Administrative Court Act 621/1999, s. 111
AI generated
kho-other_2018_5241
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding planning authority for residents outside municipality boundaries.
kho-other_2017_3502
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses planning appeal due to procedural defects and lack of standing for listed individuals.
kho-other_2017_3815
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding quarrying permit where traffic safety concerns were deemed irrelevant to the permit decision.
admin_2017_aland__20
Administrative court dismissed appeal against detailed plan for industrial and storage areas in Åland.
kho-other_2018_2318
KHO 16.5.2018/2318

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asia

Asemakaavaa koskeva valituslupahakemus

Muutoksenhakijat

A ja hänen kuusi asiakumppaniaan

Päätös, jota muutoksenhaku koskee

Pohjois-Suomen hallinto-oikeus 8.7.2025 nro 1004/2025

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaisu

Valituslupahakemus hylätään. Korkein hallinto-oikeus ei siten anna ratkaisua valitukseen.

Perustelut

Oikeudenkäynnistä hallintoasioissa annetun lain 111 §:n 1 momentin mukaan valituslupa on myönnettävä, jos:

1) lain soveltamisen kannalta muissa samanlaisissa tapauksissa tai oikeuskäytännön yhtenäisyyden vuoksi on tärkeätä saattaa asia korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi;

2) asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi on erityistä aihetta asiassa tapahtuneen ilmeisen virheen vuoksi; tai

3) valitusluvan myöntämiseen on muu painava syy.

Sen perusteella, mitä asiassa on esitetty ja mitä asiakirjoista muutoin ilmenee, asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi ei ole valitusluvan myöntämisen perustetta.

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Riitta Mutikainen, Eija Siitari ja Kari Tornikoski. Asian esittelijä Hanna-Maria Schiestl.