Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO 2.6.2026/1518 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses public procurement appeal due to lack of special reason for review.

Case Number KHO 2.6.2026/1518
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court rejected the appeal filed by Škoda Transtech Oy against a Market Court decision regarding a public procurement dispute. The court found no special reason under the Administrative Justice Act to bring the case before the highest court, as the lower court's decision did not involve an obvious error or require uniformity of practice. Consequently, the appeal was not granted, and the original Market Court ruling stands.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Administrative Justice Act 551/2017, s. 111 §; The Supreme Administrative Court grants leave to appeal only if there is a special reason such as an obvious error or the need for uniformity of practice, which was absent in this public procurement case.

Keywords

AI generated
public procurement appeal Administrative Justice Act special reason for appeal obvious error standard uniformity of practice leave to appeal Market Court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Administrative Justice Act 551/2017, s. 111 §
AI generated
market_2010_455
Market Court dismisses bid protest; claimant not a party after voluntarily withdrawing bid due to non-discriminatory tender terms.
kho-other_2016_4641
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; public procurement procedure suspension was lawful and did not violate competition principles.
kho-other_2016_856
Supreme Administrative Court allows cost claims against losing tenderer but denies access to confidential bid documents.
kho-other_2017_2153
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal on public procurement bid rejection due to unclear quality system requirements.
kho-other_2015_564
SAC dismisses appeal against procurement decision where tenderer lacked standing for specific vehicle types.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asia

Julkista hankintaa koskeva valituslupahakemus

Muutoksenhakija

Škoda Transtech Oy

Päätös, jota muutoksenhaku koskee

Markkinaoikeus, 27.3.2026, 159/2026

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaisu

Valituslupahakemus hylätään. Korkein hallinto-oikeus ei siten anna ratkaisua valitukseen.

Perustelut

Oikeudenkäynnistä hallintoasioissa annetun lain 111 §:n 1 momentin mukaan valituslupa on myönnettävä, jos:

1) lain soveltamisen kannalta muissa samanlaisissa tapauksissa tai oikeuskäytännön yhtenäisyyden vuoksi on tärkeätä saattaa asia korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi;

2) asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi on erityistä aihetta asiassa tapahtuneen ilmeisen virheen vuoksi; tai

3) valitusluvan myöntämiseen on muu painava syy.

Sen perusteella, mitä asiassa on esitetty ja mitä asiakirjoista muutoin ilmenee, asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi ei ole valitusluvan myöntämisen perustetta.

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Riitta Mutikainen, Eija Siitari ja Vesa-Pekka Nuotio. Asian esittelijä Heidi Muukkonen.