Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KHO 26.6.2025/1486 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed competition complaints regarding property management service fees and market dominance.

Case Number KHO 26.6.2025/1486
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the complaints filed by property management companies against the Competition and Consumer Authority. The applicants argued that the Authority's decision on service fees and market dominance violated competition laws, while the Authority contended the fees were reasonable and the market structure was not distorted. The court ruled that the Authority's findings were based on sufficient evidence and did not infringe upon the applicants' rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Competition Act 1997; Consumer Protection Act 2014: The Competition and Consumer Authority's decision on service fees and market dominance is valid if based on sufficient evidence and does not violate competition laws.

Keywords

AI generated
Competition Act 1997 Consumer Protection Act 2014 Property management fees Market dominance Competition Authority decision Service fee regulation Administrative review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Competition Act 1997
Consumer Protection Act 2014
AI generated
kho-other_2019_3713
Supreme Administrative Court increases damages from 15k to 30k due to repeated violations and awareness of legal review.
kho-other_2026_1694
Supreme Administrative Court partially allows appeal, reducing penalty to 200k but dismissing cost reimbursement claim.
market_2012_251
Market Court dismissed Accenture's bid protest against Hansel Oy's IT procurement decision, ruling the process lawful.
kho-precedent_2016_90
Supreme Administrative Court ruled procurement unit violated public procurement rules by suspending tender due to a competitor's appeal.
kho-precedent_2004_2
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal claiming separate appealability of dominance existence statement in abuse case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asia

Kilpailuasiaa koskevat valitukset

Muutoksenhakijat

Oulun Kiinteistötieto Oy ja

Suomen Kiinteistöhallinta Oy (diaarinumero 149/2023)

REIM Hämeenlinna Oy ja

REIM Group Oy Ltd (diaarinumero 153/2023)

Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto (diaarinumero 154/2023)

Retta Services Oy (nykyisin Retta Isännöinti Oy),

Retta Group Oy ja Retta Holding Oy (diaarinumero 157/2023)

Päätös, jota muutoksenhaku koskee

Markkinaoikeus 15.12.2022 nro H409/2022

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden päätös ja sen liitteenä oleva markkinaoikeuden päätös ovat erillisinä liitetiedostoina.

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Hannele Ranta-Lassila, Eija Siitari, Mikko Pikkujämsä, Vesa-Pekka Nuotio ja Anne Nenonen. Asian esittelijä Jukka Koivusalo.

Liitteet

KHO 26.6.2025 T1486

MAO 15.12.2022 H409