Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
HFD 2.2.2024/223 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal request as no legal issue of importance exists for uniform application.

Case Number HFD 2.2.2024/223
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court rejected the appeal request filed by Meripesä Paradise Oy regarding a state grant. The lower court had already resolved the case, and the appellant failed to demonstrate a significant legal issue requiring Supreme Court review. Consequently, the court found no statutory grounds under the Administrative Court Act to grant leave to appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

According to Section 111 of the Administrative Court Act; leave to appeal is granted only if the case is important for uniform application of law or due to obvious error, which was not established here.

Keywords

AI generated
leave to appeal administrative court act uniform application of law state grant supreme administrative court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 111 of the Administrative Court Act
AI generated
kho-other_2015_2178
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeals against a permit for municipal land expropriation for housing development under specific statutory grounds.
kho-other_2018_801
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against environmental permit for quarrying, upholding statutory noise and pollution limits.
kho-other_2016_5551
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeals regarding wind farm zoning, citing lack of standing for some plaintiffs and valid administrative procedure.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2025:74
Supreme Administrative Court allows municipality to use purchase right to preserve recreational trail value in national park area.
kho-other_2017_2812
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeals against a town planning plan approval due to procedural time limits and lack of legal basis.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asia

Valituslupahakemus valtion etuosto-oikeutta koskevassa asiassa

Muutoksenhakija

Meripesä Paradise Oy

Päätös, jota muutoksenhaku koskee

Turun hallinto-oikeus, 29.3.2023, H579/2023

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaisu

Valituslupahakemus hylätään. Korkein hallinto-oikeus ei siten anna ratkaisua valitukseen.

Perustelut

Oikeudenkäynnistä hallintoasioissa annetun lain 111 §:n 1 momentin mukaan valituslupa on myönnettävä, jos:

1) lain soveltamisen kannalta muissa samanlaisissa tapauksissa tai oikeuskäytännön yhtenäisyyden vuoksi on tärkeätä saattaa asia korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi;

2) asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi on erityistä aihetta asiassa tapahtuneen ilmeisen virheen vuoksi; tai

3) valitusluvan myöntämiseen on muu painava syy.

Sen perusteella, mitä muutoksenhakija on esittänyt ja mitä asiakirjoista muutoin ilmenee, asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi ei ole valitusluvan myöntämisen perustetta.

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Riitta Mutikainen, Mika Seppälä, Kari Tornikoski, Tuomas Kuokkanen ja Jaakko Autio. Asian esittelijä Pekka Kemppainen.