Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 12.12.2006/353:2005 AI generated

Employment abroad by non-resident member qualifies for domestic unemployment benefits under EU social security rules.

Case Number VakO 12.12.2006/353:2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court ruled that the applicant's work in Sweden while a member of a Finnish unemployment fund satisfied the employment requirement for benefits. The court determined that EU social security regulations and case law mandate counting this period as employment in Finland. Consequently, the claim for unemployment benefits was granted based on the cross-border nature of the work.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 48 and 51 of the EU Social Security Coordination Regulation; Work performed by a member of a domestic unemployment fund in another EU state counts as employment in the home state for benefit eligibility purposes.

Keywords

AI generated
EU social security coordination unemployment benefit eligibility cross-border employment member of unemployment fund employment requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Articles 48 and 51 of the EU Social Security Coordination Regulation
AI generated
insurance_1997_12519-1995
Swedish unemployment insurance member's summer work in Sweden counts for Finnish work requirement.
insurance_2018_72-2016
Insurance court dismissed claim for Finnish unemployment benefits due to lack of Swedish unemployment insurance membership during work period.
insurance_1998_5639-1997
Unemployment insurance court denied membership because applicant was not employed in the insurance company's specific field of business.
labour_2007_63
Labor court denies overtime pay claim when foreign work terms are fixed in a separate commission contract.
insurance_1994_8918-1993
Insurance court dismissed claim for unemployment benefits for a company director who was a salaried employee.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli Ruotsissa työskennellessään ollut suomalaisen työttömyyskassan jäsen kuulumatta ruotsalaiseen työttömyyskassaan. EY:n sosiaaliturva-asetuksen säännösten ja EY-tuomioistuimen oikeuskäytännön perusteella vakuutusoikeus katsoi, että kyseinen työskentely tuli lukea työssäoloehtoon Suomessa.

Rättsfallsreferat på svenska