Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 11.4.2001/10611:99 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim to recover overpaid pension from undivided estate due to debt transfer.

Case Number VakO 11.4.2001/10611:99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the claimant's request to recover excessive pension payments from the undivided estate of the deceased. The facts show the pension fund had overpaid due to an error, collected the excess from the estate, and argued the debt transferred to the undivided estate alongside all other liabilities. The court upheld the decision because the estate legally assumed the debt, making recovery necessary despite its financial situation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act s. 10; Insurance Court Act s. 24: The court may order recovery of overpaid benefits from the undivided estate when the debt has legally transferred to the estate as part of the deceased's liabilities.

Keywords

AI generated
undivided estate overpaid pension debt transfer estate liability insurance court pension recovery succession law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act s. 10
Insurance Court Act s. 24
AI generated
insurance_1982_9344-1981
Social security court dismissed appeal for missing statutory notice on overpayment recovery procedure.
insurance_2008_3883-2007
Insurance court dismissed appeal on jurisdiction grounds for deceased's heir's personal liability and upheld pension recovery.
insurance_1978_8866-1976
Insurance court dismissed pension decision removal and rejected recovery of undue benefit due to erroneous consolidation.
insurance_1985_274-1985
Insurance court partially allowed claim for overpaid pension due to administrative error, exempting one quarter from recovery.
insurance_1977_14-1977
Court allowed suspension of pension due to valid reasons for refusing vocational training.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Diaarinumero 10611:99

Antopäivä 11.4.2001

A:lle oli hänen eläessään maksettu liikaa eläkettä eläkelaitoksen maksatusvirheen johdosta. Eläkelaitos oli kohtuullistanut takaisinperittävää määrää ja perinyt kuolinpesältä liikaa maksetut eläkkeet.

Vakuutusoikeus katsoi, että takaisinperintä voitiin kohdistaa jakamattomaan kuolinpesään. Velka oli siirtynyt kuolinpesälle kuten kaikki muutkin A:n vastuut ja varallisuus. Ottaen huomioon mm. kuolinpesän taloudellinen tilanne, takaisinperinnästä ei ollut syytä luopua enempää. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu ja kuolinpesän valitus siis hylättiin.

Jaosto

II