Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 14.9.2000/8559:99 AI generated

Court ruled that an art student's part-time work as a painter did not disqualify them from unemployment benefits.

Case Number VakO 14.9.2000/8559:99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court reversed the Unemployment Security Board's decision to deny benefits to an art student who had worked part-time as a painter. The Board argued that the student's employment history and artistic work constituted substantial activity, but the Court found the work to be incidental. Consequently, the court determined that the student remained eligible for unemployment support starting September 7, 1998.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Security Act; Part-time employment: Incidental work by a student does not constitute substantial activity and does not disqualify the individual from receiving unemployment security benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment security benefits part-time employment student status substantial activity incidental work insurance court ruling work history assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment Security Act
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Katsottiin, että Vapaassa Taidekoulussa vuosina 19931997 opiskelleen ja päästötodistuksen huhtikuussa 1997 saaneen henkilön työhistoriasta ja taidemaalarin työstä saatu selvitys huomioon ottaen hänen työllistymisensä omassa työssään taidemaalarina on ollut sivutoimista eikä esteitä työmarkkinatuen maksamiselle tämän vuoksi 7.9.1998 alkaen ollut. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin.

Jaosto:V Äänestys: 3-2