Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 26.9.2000/5100:99 AI generated

Adult education grant denied because business ended 17 days before study start, failing the one-year continuous self-employment requirement.

Case Number VakO 26.9.2000/5100:99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim for adult education funding after reviewing the timeline between business closure and study commencement. Although the applicant had been unemployed and started studies, the 17-day gap between ending business operations and beginning education meant they did not meet the continuous self-employment criterion. Consequently, the court upheld the denial of the grant based on the statutory requirement for uninterrupted prior self-employment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Act on Adult Education Grants; Act on Social Insurance; An applicant who terminates self-employment and begins studies within a short period fails to satisfy the requirement of having been continuously self-employed for at least one year immediately prior to starting studies.

Keywords

AI generated
adult education grants continuous self-employment business termination timing social insurance eligibility study start requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act on Adult Education Grants
Act on Social Insurance
AI generated
insurance_2002_9685-2001
Court dismissed appeal against unemployment benefits denial due to failure to meet continuous business operation requirements.
insurance_2006_6967-2005
Unfinished studies due to missing exam disqualify unemployed benefit claimant as active student.
insurance_1987_2213-1986
Student barista denied unemployment benefits as full-time student during summer break.
insurance_1984_1028-1984
Finnish Insurance Court dismissed claim that home-based LVI technician worked under employment contract.
insurance_1990_410-1990
Part-time teacher denied unemployment benefits for period after contract ended due to lack of layoff.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

X:n vuosia kestänyt yritystoiminta oli päättynyt 31.7.1998. Tämän jälkeen hän oli ollut työttömänä. Hänen opintonsa olivat alkaneet 18.8.1998. Ennen opintojen alkua X ei ollut saanut työttömyyspäivärahaa. Vakuutusoikeus katsoi, koska yritystoiminnan päättymisen ja opintojen alkamisen välillä oli 17 päivää, ettei X ollut välittömästi ennen opintojen alkamista toiminut itsenäisenä yrittäjänä vähintään vuotta. Hän oli aloittanut opintonsa työttömyystilanteessa, mutta työttömyyspäivärahaa hän ei ollut kuitenkaan saanut ennen opintojen alkamista. X ei näin ollen täyttänyt aikuisopintorahan myöntämisehtoja. Opintotuen muutoksenhakulautakunnan päätös kumottiin ja asia jätettiin Kansaneläkelaitoksen opintotukikeskuksen antaman päätöksen varaan.

Jaosto:V Äänestys: 3-2