Child's foster care placement is not the sole reason for child allowance to be a heavy reason for unemployment support payment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Unemployment Security Board's decision to deny unemployment support was not altered by the court. The applicant argued that the child's placement in a foster home under child protection laws constituted a heavy reason for the child allowance to be a reason for paying unemployment support. The court held that such placement alone does not automatically qualify as the sole heavy reason required for payment obligations.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUnemployment Security Act; Child Protection Act: The placement of a child in a foster home under child protection laws is not, in itself, the sole heavy reason for the child allowance to be a reason for paying unemployment support to the social board.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Koska työmarkkinatuen lapsikorotus on hakijan, ei lapsen tuloa, ei yksinomaan se, että lapsi oli sijoitettu lastenkotiin lastensuojelulain mukaisena avohuollon tukitoimenpiteenä ollut työttömyysturvalaissa tarkoitettu erityisen painava syy maksaa työmarkkinatukea sosiaalilautakunnalle. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöksen lopputulosta ei muutettu.
Jaosto:VII Äänestys: